Using the two non-nuclear density gauges would have resulted in 100% overall pay. Example of CPN profiling neutron moisture meter resting on depth control stand. (4) If pay factors were determined from gauge densities, then using the densities provided by the TMTL gauge would have resulted in a 5% reduction in overall pay for lane densities. Nuclear Gauge Design, Theory and Operation. The overlap for the TMTL was 83% and for the KTC PQI was 78%. and the Troxler eGauge as suitable replacements for nuclear density gauge. (3) The density distribution of the HHR PQI gauge most closely matched the distribution of the cores with an 88% overlap in the distributions. Validation testing of non-nuclear alternatives to measuring soil density. However, there was a statistically significant difference between the mean density of the TMTL and KTC PQI and the cores. (2) There was no significant difference between the mean density of the HHR PQI and the mean density of the cores. Findings were as follows: (1) The standard deviations of the density readings of all the gauges were greater than the standard deviation of the overall density of the cores, indicating more "scatter" in the data from the gauges than in the core data. Studies concerning the three devices and many additional devices for unbound materials were reviewed. Two non-nuclear density gauges, one operated by the contractor (HHR PQI) and the other operated by the research team (KTC PQI), were tested. The other gauge was the PQI Model 300 non-nuclear density gauge manufactured by Transtech Systems, Inc. The nuclear density gauge was a Troxler, Model 4640-D, thin-layer nuclear density gauge (TMTL). The objective of this study was to compare a non-nuclear density gauge with a nuclear density gage for quality control on hot mix asphalt paving projects.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. Archives
March 2023
Categories |